Tuesday, October 5, 2010

The Prophecy Part 1

One of the arguments I often hear from contracepting Catholics is that they think the Church's teaching is archaic and outdated. It seems that they justify their actions with the belief that eventually the Church will join the rest of the world that seems to believe that the birth control pill is the greatest thing since sliced bread.

The fact is that few Catholics or Protestants have any idea of the history of contraception in Christianity. It would probably come as a shock to most people that ALL Christian denominations condemned all forms of birth control until 1930, when the Anglican church made an exception to this rule saying that contraception was okay only in grave circumstances.

This opened the door to people beginning to rethink their ideas about family planning methods across the country, and then the contraceptive pill was released in 1960. However, contraception remained illegal in some parts of the country until 1965 with the case Griswold vs. Connecticut when the Supreme Court ruled that couples had a right to marital privacy in this area of their lives. (This right to privacy was later used as precedent in the legalization of abortion, but that is a whole other post.)

At this point, Catholics fully expected the Catholic Church to move with the times and change her teaching on contraception, and they anxiously awaited the big announcement. Even many of the priests and bishops felt that it was only a matter of time.

Meanwhile, the Vatican was pulling together a panel of highly respected doctors, scientists, and moral ethicists to research the contraceptive pill so that the Church could fully understand how it worked and determine if it could possibly be used without violating the Church's teaching on sexuality and the dignity of the human person.

Perhaps the pill simply helped to regulate a woman's cycle making it easier to use the Rhythm Method... not so.

What they found is that the primary function of the pill is to suppress ovulation, and just in case a pesky egg managed to escape, the pill also changed the lining of the uterus to prevent implantation of any fertilized ovum essentially flushing away any new life that was formed. (It still works this way, and few women are aware that they are potentially aborting their tiny babies each month.)

Both of these modes of operation absolutely worked against the dignity of the human person, and absolutely could not be condoned by the Church.

So in 1968, Pope Paul VI issued the encyclical Humanae Vitae, and it dropped like a bomb on the world.

Stay tuned for part 2!

Photobucket

15 comments:

  1. GO MEGAN GO!!!!!! I'm so glad you're writing about this! Very clear and articulate. can't wait for part 2!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for sharing this. Very few women know the history of the pill, how it works, or how damaging it is.
    derya

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm an eternal optimist and believe that eventually women will realize the "bill of goods" they've been sold in the form of bcp. One day NFP or some other method of monitoring our fertility will be back in the lime-light as the best thing since sliced bread. I know so many older women that regret using it, and lots of women that have health and emotional problems because of it. I can't wait for part two!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I wish more people knew how the BCP really worked.

    ReplyDelete
  5. So do ALL forms of the pill act as an abortifacient if there's a breakthrough ovulation and an egg is fertilized? I guess I thought only certain forms of it did that, but I'd LOVE to use that as an argument if it's true and if I'm understanding it correctly.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Keep on teaching sista! Wish people would wise up about bc pill.

    ReplyDelete
  7. AYWH, yes, all methods of hormonal contraceptives change the lining of the uterus to prevent implantation.
    There is some debate about whether or not this always prevents implantation in some types of birth control, but the bottom line is that there really is no way to prove that they don't act as an abortifacient and they all have the potential to be.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Great post! If they only knew that Creighton, is not only as affective or more than the pill, but that it can help maintain the gynecological health of women! Just recently a friend just by charting found out that she had a hormonal problem that could have prevented her from becoming pregnant and if she had become pregnant she almost certainly would have miscarried. With the BCP she would never had learned this with enough time to fix it.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Thank-you for posting this so succinctly! As a former BCP user, I wish I'd understood not only exactly how the pill worked, but the other side effects, and WHY the Catholic Church said 'no'.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Great post! Thanks so much for speaking out about this!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Human Life International published the following book available on line called Facts of Life. Here is the link to the table of contents.:
    http://hli.org/index.php/the-facts-of-life

    I want to highlight parts of chapter 2, 21 and 22, but I'm sure the entire book is interesting.

    Chapter 2: Abortificients: "How the Definition of Conception has Evolved and Why This is Important"

    Fascinating chart on that link.

    Chapter 2: Abortificients: Oral Contraceptive PIlls Part 1 and Part 2
    Part 1 is particularlly of interest, as it has specific information about how oral contraceptives work, a very informative chart detailing different levels of estrogen and progesterone, and specifics regarding which medication falls in which category. You should be able to find the type of BC you use on the chart. Part 2 includes other dangerous side effects of the pill.

    Chapter 21: Contraception: The Historical Teaching of the Christian Church on Contraception Includes Catholic and Protestant thought

    ReplyDelete
  12. Here's the piece of missing information that was HUGE for me. They have CHANGED the DEFINITION of CONCEPTION!!!!

    You or I would define conception as when the egg and sperm meet.

    But in 1963 the US Dept of Health, Education, and Welfare changed it to IMPLANTATION!!!

    So they can create a pill that makes the uterus hostile to the zygote, and STILL say they're just preventing conception!

    Go here for info:
    http://www.hli.org/index.php/the-facts-of-life/245?task=view

    ReplyDelete

Thanks for stopping by and sharing your thoughts! I love comments. :)